Oct 22

[original post from TheDouglassReport.com, http://douglassreport.com/2011/10/16/health-nazi-france/]

France’s sugar tax: How sweet it isn’t

Talk about déjà vu all over again!

Just a week after Denmark unveiled its infamous “fat tax,” France is announcing a “sin” tax of its own: a dime-a-liter surcharge on sugar-sweetened sodas.

Now, I’m never going to defend sugar — it’s the single largest dietary contributor to obesity, diabetes, heart disease, and an early death in all of Western civilization.

But I’ll always defend your God-given RIGHT to make your own decisions about your diet, your health, and your lifestyle — a right governments around the world want to snatch right out of your hands.

Case in point: France, where the soda tax is only the beginning.
Read the rest of this entry »

Feb 12

[original article here]

Memo to Each HHS Employee Working on Implementing Obamacare: How Would ‘10 Years in Federal Prison for Violating 18 USC 641′ Look On Your Resume?

Now that a federal judge has obliterated Obamacare by ruling it unconstitutional, Alaska’s governor is asking the obvious question: would continuing to spend money implementing an unconstitutional law represent fraud against the U.S. taxpayer?

Alaska Gov. Sean Parnell is asking his attorney general to advise him on whether implementing the federal health care overhaul would put Parnell in violation of his oath of office. 

A federal judge in Florida this week struck down the law as unconstitutional in a case joined by 26 states, including Alaska. A major point of contention is a provision requiring citizens to buy health insurance… Parnell says he took an oath to support and defend the constitutions of the United States and Alaska. While the Republican governor concedes the issue is expected to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court, he says he has a duty to uphold the law and wants the attorney general to advise him on what the duty is after the Florida ruling.

Read the rest of this entry »

Dec 31

For crying out loud!! One generation of whiney, snot-nose brat begat yet another. While I’m no fan of McD’s or other “fast food,” who the hell holds the wallet containing the cash or debit card? Mom or the three-year-old?

So that she doesn’t have to hear her kid whining at home or in the car–not that hot tea burned her kid’s lips or that there was a dead mouse’s in her kid’s cheeseburger or that there were peanuts in an ice cream dish that was labelled “peanut-free”–Ms Parham decided her ONLY recourse was to sue McD’s?? I.e., whining in front of a judge and possibly a jury, taking up  about McD’s making her kid whine in front of her?? WTH?

Someone call Nanny Jo on Momma Parham, PLEASE!! And I hope Ms Parham loses her case and McD’s gets damages against her for filing a frivlous lawsuit.
 ========================================================
From a Findlaw.com article:

Is this the first lawsuit brought about by whining? A suit has been filed in San Francisco superior court over Happy Meals. After laws passed by Santa Clara County and San Francisco, California, placing limits on fast food meals marketed to children, a private citizen has taken matters into her own hands.

Sacramento mother Monet Parham, represented by Center for Science in the Public Interest, has sued McDonald’s for false advertising and unfair competition, claiming the restaurant chains’ practice of giving away toys with Happy Meals is deceptive to children.

Read the rest of this entry »

Dec 1

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger via NaturalNews.com

(NaturalNews) It is now being revealed that US Senators slipped up in a big way when passing the Food Safety Modernization Act on Tuesday: They added what are effectively “new taxes” into the bill, and according to the U.S. Constitution, only the House of Representatives can initiate legislation requiring new taxes.

Thus, the House is now obliged to give this food safety legislation the so-called “blue slip,” meaning that it rejects the law and sends it back to the Senate for yet another vote. This would take time and effort, of course, and the Democrats have very little of either remaining in their lame duck session.

As explained on Wikipedia(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_slip):

“This blue-slipping procedure, done by an order of the House, is routinely completed to enforce its interpretation that the House is the sole body to introduce revenue or appropriations legislation. The failure of the House to consider the legislation means it cannot become a law. This tactic has historically proven to be of great use to the House and, as a practical matter, the Senate does not introduce tax or revenue measures to avoid a blue slip.” Read the rest of this entry »

Nov 22

Via WeTexans.com

Only one day after the people of Texas sent a message to their Texas delegation that they wanted less government, lower taxes and freedom from the bonds of an ever increasing intrusive government, including paying for an unconstitutional federal Health Care Bill, the momentum seems to be gathering to once again impale the homeowner.

Yet the strong rhetoric we heard from Rick Perry, David Dewhurst and others candidates during the elections was that they would “stand up for our 10th Amendment rights”.  Read the announcement of this hearing and think about how this fits in with standing up for our Constitutional rights.  And think about why only “invited” testimony will be heard.  99% of the time this is from the “stateholders”; that is those that want your money – not the people who will lose their homes if this legislation is enacted.

The only way we are going to keep the leeches from sucking our blood dry is to outlaw property tax in Texas forever.  We have begun this process but we need your help.  Call committee members and let them know that paying for Obamacare through increased property tax is not acceptable, and tell Republican members to make good on their promise to stand up for our 10th Amendment rights in Texas and to just vote “nay” on any attempt to implement this in our state – much less on the backs of homeowners.

Here’s the Where and When

  • COMMITTEE: State Affairs
  • TIME & DATE:   9:00 AM, Tuesday, November 23, 2010
  • PLACE:   E1.030 (House Appropriations)
  • CHAIR: Senator Robert Duncan

See all of the State Affair committee members after the page break.

Read the rest of this entry »

Sep 6
The Houston Area Liberty Campaign (HALC) is continuing the tradition of celebrating Constitution Day by hosting “The Constitution and You” on Thursday, September 23, 2010, from 5:30 pm to 8:15 pm.  Tickets are only $10. You must purchase tickets online as tickets cannot be bought or sold at the facility due to Harris County Community Center restrictions.

PURCHASE TICKETS HERE

Three dynamic speakers will discuss a wide range of Constitutional topics which will include:
  • Property Taxes, “Obamacare” and other Unconstitutional Laws
  • Constitution 101 and the Preamble
  • State Sovereignty and the 10th Amendment
  • Natural Law and the War on Drugs
  • The Economics of Immigration
  • Which “Federal Agencies” are actually NOT Federal Agencies
  • And much more!
Our speakers include former Texas Gubernatorial Candidate Debra Medina, local business owner and HALC’s former chairman, Bill Tofte and former NYPD Detective and Assistant State Coordinator for the Florida Campaign for Liberty John Baeza.

Mingle with guests early and enjoy a light potluck-style dinner compliments of HALC members and volunteers.

###

About The Houston Area Liberty Campaign
The Houston Area Liberty Campaign is an organization defined by the message of liberty and freedom – a community of volunteers, organized from the ground up, with the purpose of bringing this message to the people. This group can do nothing without the individual heroism of vigilant patriots. It is our belief that through grassroot actions we can bring about a revolutionary change across the entire spectrum of the political process. Upholding the ideals of decentralized action and individual leadership has allowed us to accomplish much, and the continued embodiment of these principles will lead us to continued success.www.halc.us

About Debra Medina
Ms. Debra Medina is a recent Republican gubernatorial candidate, garnering almost 20% of the vote while running against two career politicians with huge war chests. Debra was recruited for her run as a gubernatorial candidate by the grassroots because she was known to the average Texan as hardworking, honest, and principled, and therefore a true “peoples’ candidate.” She was recently named as one of the 50 most influential Texans in the public policy arena by the national publication, Politics and Elections Magazine.

While running in the gubernatorial campaign, Debra earned the respect and support of thousands of citizens across Texas and subsequently formed We Texans so that she and her supporters could continue to educate and work on the issues which have become so important to Texas citizens. The non-profit, non-partisan organization promotes public policy and legislation which advances and protects private property and personal and economic liberty.  We Texans, through education and activism, engages in research and analysis with the ultimate goal of returning the Texas government to the citizenry within the framework of constitutional government.

Debra has also excelled in her personal and political life prior to her gubernatorial run. She and her husband of 25 years, Noe, home schooled both their children, when it wasn’t nearly as easy or acceptable as it is today. Debra is a registered nurse and founder and CEO of Prudentia, a medical consulting firm. She is the Wharton County Republican Party Chair and has been involved in politics for over twenty years.

Debra is a sought after speaker, a much requested guest on radio and television stations, has had literally hundreds of web site and blog mentions, and has had articles published by The 10th Amendment Center as well as other online media outlets.

About John Baeza
Mr. John Baeza is an Assistant State Coordinator with the Florida Campaign for Liberty.  John educated himself about the Constitution, has developed a Constitution course for the Florida Campaign for Liberty, teaches that course and also gives presentations about the Federal Reserve.

John is a retired NYPD Detective where he worked undercover narcotics with the NYPD before spending the last six years in the Special Victims Squad investigating sex crimes, child abuse, serial rapes and sexual homicides.   John’s success in sex crime investigations resulted in a method of determining truthfulness of alleged assault victims, perpetrators and witnesses named after him: the “Baeza False Report Index” (BAFRI).  http://twitter.com/johnbaeza

Before retiring, he also worked as a deputy sheriff in Florida.  Even though he’s a retired Detective, John is a staunch libertarian and sees Constitutional issues as very black and white.  John believes the premise for the ‘War on Drugs’ violates the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

In 1984 he began his 24-year law enforcement career, as a corrections officer at Sing Sing.  But then came the day when John no longer felt that being a soldier for prohibition had anything to do with helping people. After an undercover assignment gone wrong, from which John had barely escaped with his life, the first thing his department chief wanted to know was whether the drug-buy money stolen from John at gunpoint had been recovered.

“After this encounter, I never made another buy,” John relates.  “An epiphany, a life change – who knows?  All I know is that this near-death incident changed everything about me. I no longer believed in the ‘drug war.’  I no longer felt the police should criminalize an individual for self-medicating himself while not infringing on the rights of others. I was a changed man.”  He immediately transferred out of narcotics and went to the Special Victims Squad where he then became an investigator in sexual assaults; murders; and child molestations.  Grisly work but satisfying when you can put bad guys behinds bars.

So he has fought in the “War on Drugs” at just about every law-enforcement level, all because, as he puts it, “I wanted to help people.”

About Bill Tofte

Mr. Bill Tofte is the former Chair of HALC and, along with his brother Mike, operates ITD Precision, founded in 1946 by Bill and Mike’s father.  ITD Precision is a metal stamping, heat treating, e-coating and insert molding company that has been in continuous operation for 64 years and specializes in high-quality metal stamping. Automotive, electronic, oil field, construction, power transmission, electric and appliance companies find that ITD fits their special requirements for quality, delivery, and price.  ITD Precision has an office in Houston, near US 290 and Telge Road and an office in Harlingen, Texas. www.itdprecision.com

Bill has given presentations to business groups about business operations.  Bill also has given several speeches and presentations on issues such as “Audit the Fed,” “End the Fed,” and constitutional issues in general.

Aug 29

[From HALC member Laura B]
================================================

By: Allen Darman

http://nutrientscure.wordpress.com

Introduction

Alternative medicine clearly has won the battle of truth about healing on the Internet during the past ten years.

So much has changed regarding alternative medicine on the Internet in the past decade. Its presence has exploded exponentially. And so has its depth of healing knowledge. (It has found many cures, when none existed before.)

Alternative medicine has “trumped” conventional drug-oriented medicine in the past decade, as far as the truth is concerned. If you perform a “simple linking search” on the Internet typing in whatever illness you may have, and precede it with the words “alternative medicine” or “integrative medicine” (without the quote marks), and then compare what you find to what conventional medicine has to offer for the very same illness, the aforementioned fact will often be clear.

Does this mean that alternative medicine is going to replace conventional drug-oriented medicine in a very big way, as it justifiably should?

Not necessarily.

It is up to the law.

Alternative vs. Governmental Medicine

Federal law in America favors ONLY conventional drug-oriented medicine at this point. (“Governmental medicine” is the appropriate term for the latter. Governmental medicine and conventional drug-oriented are synonymous, for the former mandates the latter.) 

Federal law does so with its ridiculous FDA mandate that states “ONLY A DRUG can prevent, diagnose, treat, or cure ALL disease”. (Based on reality, this is nuts!)

In taking the above position, federal law is also mandating the reverse; NO NUTRIENT, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT, ***OR*** NATURAL MEASURE is allowed to prevent, diagnose, treat, or cure ANY disease”. (Based on reality, this is nuts!)

Read the rest of this entry »

Jul 24

Interesting reading.  Be informed before you vote in the current primaries and in the general elections coming this November 2010…your new taxes… 
 
You better change the current leadership in Congress or find a way to hide your money, because they are coming to take it from you in 2011…
 
This is astounding.  Many have no clue about the changes coming our way in 2011 and beyond under the current US Congressional leadership (super majority of tax and spenders extraordinaire). The new tax impact on the average taxpayer as outlined below is hard to imagine. Not to mention the shock wave that will ripple through every part of the economy.  Just adding health care benefits as part of income on the W-2 of every employee in the USA will add $150.00 a month to the average couple’s tax debt. Who has that budgeted for 2011? The Arizona Immigration Law federal lawsuit, DOJ/Black Panther story, Lindsay Lohan trial story, etc, etc in the nightly media are just distractions to keep everyone’s attention off real impacting issues like this one.  Read this and weep about how much money you are going to lose five months from now; when the tax laws change in January 2011…
 
Subject: 2011 Tax Increases
 
In just five months, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves on January 1, 2011:
 
If you want to see the entire list of increased taxes for average citizens; you can download this complete PDF Version at the following link:  http://www.atr.org/six-months-untilbr-largest-tax-hikes-a5171##ixzz0sY8waPq1
 
First Wave of Taxes in 2011:  Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief
 
In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families.
Read the rest of this entry »

Apr 12
Original Editorial by HALC member Jeff Larson
FDA Grants Monopoly For Centuries-Old “New” Drug


They say that if you have your health, you have everything, and I’m sure glad that I don’t have a painful disease like gout.  Gout is a painful joint disease caused by buildup of uric acid in the blood.  About 75% of the time, people who come down with gout first find out about it when they get an extremely painful inflammation right at the base of the big toe.  Nowadays, when someone gets the gout, doctors usually treat it with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) like Advil or Aleve.  You can’t take aspirin for the gout…aspirin only makes it worse.

But what did doctors do before nifty drugs like these were invented?  Read the rest of this entry »

Apr 2

I heartily agree with this writer. No city, state or federal agency should have the authority to ban a private act in a privately-owned business.

If an employee does not like that policy at that business, then even in this economy, you might be able to find employment elsewhere. There are many places of employment that have set their own smoking/non-smoking policies, so you should be able to find something to your liking.

If you’re a customer to a business that allows employees or other customers to smoke and you don’t like that, “vote” with your wallet. Take your money elsewhere. That company is NOT in business to make you happy like a spouse/significant other, child or parent would do, they’re there to sell you a product or service. Period. They only want your money. Your being happy/not happy is a side-effect of their business environment, not the sole source of your happiness/unhappiness.

Also, as far as smoking bans in bars and clubs go, it kind of goes without saying, smoking and drinking go hand-in-hand. Whether you agree or not, they are both still lawful activities. That is, unless you agree with the only public official that ever banned smoking nationally.

Here is the most successful anti-smoking campaign. Ever. Quit smoking or go to jail.

Before you assume that I’m a chain smoker or have had no dealings with smokers, I assure you, I’m not. I’m a non-smoker. My father passed away from prostate cancer and emphesema when I was 17 yrs old, in my senior year of high school. I also dated and married my spouse, who was a 1/4 pack-a-day smoker before I met my spouse. I have worked for smokers in two different offices. I just chose to protect myself by my own means, rather than having the government do it for me. If I don’t like the environment in a workplace, restaurant or other facility I utilize, I take my business elsewhere.
==================================================
[From The Daily Paul.com, story here.]

(These 2 links go together so I thought I would post them together. Please take some time and read and watch. Eye opening.)

“In the past decade, public smoking bans in America have become increasingly commonplace; governmental efforts to institute such bans often prove successful, primarily because the majority of Americans do not smoke. In other words, the majority can only gain from such legislation. Supporters reason that they should not have to inhale second-hand smoke every time they patronize the local bar. This argument is seemingly sound; most ban backers this author has encountered do indeed provide this justification when endeavoring to legitimize their views. Once effective counterarguments are rendered, however, supporters often change the foundation in which their ban advocacy initially appeared to be rooted. They then contend that employers have a responsibility to provide a smoke-free environment for their employees. Neither justification is well-reasoned. Moreover, it is unambiguous that public smoking bans are incompatible with private property rights.
Read the rest of this entry »

« Previous Entries