[Original story from http://news.lp.findlaw.com/ap/o/1110/09-25-2009/20090925053507_23.html. Hypertext added by HALC.us staff, photos’ sources as noted.]
By KATIE NELSON Associated Press Writer
There are a few signs of life: Feral cats glare at visitors from a miniature jungle of Queen Anne’s lace, thistle and goldenrod. Gulls swoop between the lot’s towering trees and the adjacent sewage treatment plant.
But what of the promised building boom that was supposed to come wrapped and ribboned with up to 3,169 new jobs and $1.2 million a year in tax revenues? They are noticeably missing.
Proponents of the ambitious plan blame the sour economy. Opponents call it a “poetic justice.”
“They are getting what they deserve. They are going to get nothing,” said Susette Kelo, the lead plaintiff in the landmark property rights case. “I don’t think this is what the United States Supreme Court justices had in mind when they made this decision.”
![Suzette Kelo #2 [Photo by Isaac Reese, © Institute for Justice, 2004, https://www.ij.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=926&Itemid=165]](http://halc.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Suzette-Kelo-21-199x300.jpg)
![Suzette Kelo [Photo from: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008753858_opina18ramsey.html]](http://halc.us/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Suzette-Kelo1.jpg)