I heartily agree with this writer. No city, state or federal agency should have the authority to ban a private act in a privately-owned business.
If an employee does not like that policy at that business, then even in this economy, you might be able to find employment elsewhere. There are many places of employment that have set their own smoking/non-smoking policies, so you should be able to find something to your liking.
If you’re a customer to a business that allows employees or other customers to smoke and you don’t like that, “vote” with your wallet. Take your money elsewhere. That company is NOT in business to make you happy like a spouse/significant other, child or parent would do, they’re there to sell you a product or service. Period. They only want your money. Your being happy/not happy is a side-effect of their business environment, not the sole source of your happiness/unhappiness.
Also, as far as smoking bans in bars and clubs go, it kind of goes without saying, smoking and drinking go hand-in-hand. Whether you agree or not, they are both still lawful activities. That is, unless you agree with the only public official that ever banned smoking nationally.
Here is the most successful anti-smoking campaign. Ever. Quit smoking or go to jail. 
Before you assume that I’m a chain smoker or have had no dealings with smokers, I assure you, I’m not. I’m a non-smoker. My father passed away from prostate cancer and emphesema when I was 17 yrs old, in my senior year of high school. I also dated and married my spouse, who was a 1/4 pack-a-day smoker before I met my spouse. I have worked for smokers in two different offices. I just chose to protect myself by my own means, rather than having the government do it for me. If I don’t like the environment in a workplace, restaurant or other facility I utilize, I take my business elsewhere.
==================================================
[From The Daily Paul.com, story here.]
(These 2 links go together so I thought I would post them together. Please take some time and read and watch. Eye opening.)
“In the past decade, public smoking bans in America have become increasingly commonplace; governmental efforts to institute such bans often prove successful, primarily because the majority of Americans do not smoke. In other words, the majority can only gain from such legislation. Supporters reason that they should not have to inhale second-hand smoke every time they patronize the local bar. This argument is seemingly sound; most ban backers this author has encountered do indeed provide this justification when endeavoring to legitimize their views. Once effective counterarguments are rendered, however, supporters often change the foundation in which their ban advocacy initially appeared to be rooted. They then contend that employers have a responsibility to provide a smoke-free environment for their employees. Neither justification is well-reasoned. Moreover, it is unambiguous that public smoking bans are incompatible with private property rights.
Read the rest of this entry »